It should be noted that a
company's quality system can only be certified to ISO 9001, ISO 9002, or ISO
9003 and that a particular quality system would only be assessed for
compliance with one of these standards The other documents listed above are
guidelines on the standards/systems for Production, Installation and
Servicing. However where there is an element of design in the products or
services provided the ISO 9001 standard is adopted. It is extremely rare for
companies to obtain ISO 9003 for final inspection and test. There is often a
grey area as to whether ISO 9001 or ISO 9002 applies and this is
particularly the case with service industries.
The ISO 9000 standards by a
technical committee ISO/TC 176 Quality Management and Quality Assurance. The
standards were last revised in July 1994 and work on the next version in
addition is currently underway. The ISO 9000 standards are not written for
any particular industry sector but are intended to apply to all business
sectors, regardless of the type of product or service evolved around
production based industries and in particular mechanical and electrical
production/systems for the Nuclear/Military industry sectors. Thus the
standards is most effective when used as a management tool for such types of
industries. Problems of interpretation and differences of opinion on
interpretation often arise when the standard is applied to purely service
industry/business sectors.
For the meaningful
certification the ISO 900 Quality standards should only be awarded by
organisations that are accredited to a particular countries national
accredited board. In the UK this organisation was called the National
Association of Certification Bodies (NACCB). More recently it has joined
with National Physical Laboratory and is called UKAS.
There are currently about
fourteen countries that have their own national accreditation bodies and
these include; UK, USA, DENMARK, HOLLAND, AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND,
SWITZERLAND, ITALY, GERMANY, CANADA, BELGIUM, SWEDEN AND BRAZIL. These
bodies are responsible for the monitoring and regulation of organisation
that award the ISO 9000 standard in their respective countries or award the
ISO 9000 certificates to companies.
The national associations would
establish such criteria as:
- THE VALIDITY OF THE AWARD OF THE CERTIFICATE
- FREQUENCY & SCOPE OF PERIODIC INSPECTIONS
- QUALIFICATIONS & INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE OF
AUDITORS
- ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
The majority of organisations
carrying out certification are third party inspection agencies that have
been traditionally involved with inspection of ships, marine and industrial
safety and other third party verification activities. There are also other
companies that are accredited to various national organisation and these
companies offer professional services for quality assurance.
In the Middle East there are no
countries or states that have their own national association for regulating
the certification bodies. Thus when the certification bodies award the ISO
9000 certificate in the Middle East, they are doing so in accordance with
the regulations of another country typically from Europe. It should be noted
that there can be differences in the regulators for the award of the ISO
9000 in different countries.
The ISO 9000 provides a
checklist of management topics that can be applied to any industry sector.
Because of this generality the standard frequently includes the phrases:
-
where appropriate
-
process which directly
affect quality
-
dependant upon the
complexity of the work
-
expectations and the needs
of its customers
-
provide adequate resources
-
quality planning shall be
documented
-
the suppliers method of
operation
thus a number of clauses which
contain subjective requirement are not defined in any detail for different
industry sectors. The interpretation of these somewhat vague clauses in the
standard is governed by the
- internal regulations of the classification
societies
- by the view of individual auditors within a single
classification society.
Although the auditor may have
been trained in the same manner and be working to the same classification
society guidelines, an element of subjectivity can creep in and different
views can be taken on these clauses. This situation exists in Europe where
good practise in business management is generally of a commonly accepted
standard due to similar educational standards and cultural values. The
element of subjectivity is even more apparent in the Middle East where there
is greater variability in values, culture and education.